What really makes a celebrity a proper celebrity? Is it the news coverage? The pursuit of tabloids? Perhaps sheer popularity is what drives us to call movie stars, musicians, and politicians celebrities. If that is the case, are the non-traditional stars celebrities as well?
In order to net a obliging respond to this jam, one must gaze for a celebrity index. CelebrityContest.glean has developed an algorithm to keep a value to a celebrity, distinguished as stocks are assigned a monetary value in order for location visitors or members to make celebrity portfolio. The algorithm takes into consideration the amount and timing of news items pertaining to celebrities as well as the popularity of the celebrity as a allotment of online portfolios. But does this adequately measure the amount of celebrity spot an individual has achieved?
Celebrity
To decide this, we need to judge what celebrity actually means. The American Heritage Dictionary defines celebrity as "a celebrated person," or "renown, fame." That definition is very ample indeed. To be renown is to simply be celebrated. Osama Bin Laden is famed, but does not necessarily have the same following as Jessica Alba. By this definition, however, they are both celebrities.
Thus, to be a celebrity, one must be either illustrious or outrageous, and the distinction is not relevant. By this same token, individuals who have developed a following in unconventional ways such as the internet or reality programming are certainly celebrities as well - albeit some have more global coverage than others. So to measure the amount of celebrity an individual has obtained, one would simply need to measure his or her popularity.
Measuring Popularity
Before the information age, to measure popularity would involve countless newspaper and magazine searches. Print resources as well as television and radio contained any and all celebrity news and gossip. With the advent of the internet, this changed, of course. In reveal times, the internet has not only opened countless doors to those aspiring to stardom, but has developed a multitude of news and gossip outlets as well.
Most of the obsolete media outlets - magazines, newspapers, radio, and television have developed an online presence. Often these websites enjoy more information pertaining to celebrities than the fresh medium. Those eager in entertainment news now have almost countless methods to win the information they recognize.
The fastest scheme to bag information online, however, is through the search engines. Major search engines index all web pages and online news items as they are developed, and offer users a chance to hone in on the desired material. Searching for celebrities will pull up thousands, if not millions, of relevant results. It follows that by simply counting the number of searches and articles for each celebrity, one could understand the popularity of that individual.
Celebrity Contest
It seems the algorithm developed by CelebrityContest.catch holds moral. The algorithm assigns value to a celebrity based on the number and age of news items and searches, which is the best indicator of popularity. Of course, the algorithm also includes results from CelebrityContest.acquire, which are a well-behaved indicator as well.
If a celebrity is celebrated, he or she will be included in many portfolios. If he is becoming blasé, he will be dropped from portfolios in favor of more approved individuals. If a celebrity is looking for a gauge of her bear value, she can invent a complicated web analysis, or simply track her brand changes on CelebrityContest.collect to understand how her fan obnoxious is feeling. Of course, fans can search for the value of their well-liked celebrity, and even cash in on the details only devoted fans are privy to - insider trading if you will.
In order to net a obliging respond to this jam, one must gaze for a celebrity index. CelebrityContest.glean has developed an algorithm to keep a value to a celebrity, distinguished as stocks are assigned a monetary value in order for location visitors or members to make celebrity portfolio. The algorithm takes into consideration the amount and timing of news items pertaining to celebrities as well as the popularity of the celebrity as a allotment of online portfolios. But does this adequately measure the amount of celebrity spot an individual has achieved?
Celebrity
To decide this, we need to judge what celebrity actually means. The American Heritage Dictionary defines celebrity as "a celebrated person," or "renown, fame." That definition is very ample indeed. To be renown is to simply be celebrated. Osama Bin Laden is famed, but does not necessarily have the same following as Jessica Alba. By this definition, however, they are both celebrities.
Thus, to be a celebrity, one must be either illustrious or outrageous, and the distinction is not relevant. By this same token, individuals who have developed a following in unconventional ways such as the internet or reality programming are certainly celebrities as well - albeit some have more global coverage than others. So to measure the amount of celebrity an individual has obtained, one would simply need to measure his or her popularity.
Measuring Popularity
Before the information age, to measure popularity would involve countless newspaper and magazine searches. Print resources as well as television and radio contained any and all celebrity news and gossip. With the advent of the internet, this changed, of course. In reveal times, the internet has not only opened countless doors to those aspiring to stardom, but has developed a multitude of news and gossip outlets as well.
Most of the obsolete media outlets - magazines, newspapers, radio, and television have developed an online presence. Often these websites enjoy more information pertaining to celebrities than the fresh medium. Those eager in entertainment news now have almost countless methods to win the information they recognize.
The fastest scheme to bag information online, however, is through the search engines. Major search engines index all web pages and online news items as they are developed, and offer users a chance to hone in on the desired material. Searching for celebrities will pull up thousands, if not millions, of relevant results. It follows that by simply counting the number of searches and articles for each celebrity, one could understand the popularity of that individual.
Celebrity Contest
It seems the algorithm developed by CelebrityContest.catch holds moral. The algorithm assigns value to a celebrity based on the number and age of news items and searches, which is the best indicator of popularity. Of course, the algorithm also includes results from CelebrityContest.acquire, which are a well-behaved indicator as well.
If a celebrity is celebrated, he or she will be included in many portfolios. If he is becoming blasé, he will be dropped from portfolios in favor of more approved individuals. If a celebrity is looking for a gauge of her bear value, she can invent a complicated web analysis, or simply track her brand changes on CelebrityContest.collect to understand how her fan obnoxious is feeling. Of course, fans can search for the value of their well-liked celebrity, and even cash in on the details only devoted fans are privy to - insider trading if you will.
